Being asked to conclude a source is a common task in various kinds of writing. It may appear to be a straightforward task: simply restate, in shorter form, what the origin says. Plenty of advanced skills are hidden in this seemingly simple assignment, however.
That point that is last often the most challenging: we are opinionated creatures, by nature, and it will be extremely tough to keep our opinions from creeping into a summary, which will be meant to be completely neutral.
In college-level writing, assignments which can be only summary are rare. Having said that, many types of writing tasks contain at the least some element of summary, from a biology report that explains what happened during a chemical process, to an analysis essay that requires you to explain what several prominent positions about gun control are, as a factor of comparing them against each other.
Many writing tasks will ask you to address a particular topic or a narrow set of topic options. Even with this issue identified, however, it could sometimes be hard to figure out what aspects of this writing shall be most significant when it comes to grading.
Often, the handout or any other written text explaining the assignment—what professors call the assignment prompt —will give an explanation for purpose of the assignment, the desired parameters (length, number and kind of sources, referencing style, etc.), in addition to criteria for evaluation. Sometimes, though—especially while you are not used to a field—you will encounter the situation that is baffling which you comprehend each and every sentence in the prompt but nevertheless have absolutely no idea how to approach the assignment. No one is doing anything wrong in a situation like this. It simply implies that further discussion associated with the assignment is within order. Continue reading “Article demonstrates ability to effectively paraphrase most of the source’s ideas.”